All Blacks criticised over ‘saviours’ claim before rivalry Tests

The All Blacks have been criticised for casting themselves as rugby’s standard-bearers ahead of the four-Test Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry series against South Africa. The Springboks have won eight of their 15 meetings with New Zealand since 2018, giving weight to the argument that success does not require adopting the All Blacks’ preferred style.

South African journalist Craig Ray has challenged the message coming from the New Zealand camp, particularly the idea that rugby should be played at a faster tempo. He argues that the All Blacks appear to regard their high-speed, skills-based approach as the game’s proper model, despite South Africa’s results with a very different plan.

Rassie Erasmus and Jacques Nienaber recognised early that trying to match New Zealand’s skills across a running game would not offer South Africa the best route to victory. The Springboks instead built their strategy around tactical kicking, set-piece strength and defensive pressure, an approach that has helped establish them as the world champions.

Ray has also rejected complaints from All Blacks assistant coach Tana Umaga and former winger John Kirwan that referees are treating New Zealand unfairly. His view is that the All Blacks and other teams must adapt to the way matches are officiated, as South Africa has done, rather than expect the laws or their interpretation to favour their approach.

The criticism comes before the opening Test at Ellis Park on Saturday. New Zealand arrive after victories over the Stormers, Sharks and Vodacom Bulls, including a 50-19 win in Pretoria last week under coach Dave Rennie.

South Africa’s wider record further supports the challenge to New Zealand’s narrative. The Springboks have won 31 of their last 34 Tests, while their eight victories over the All Blacks in the past 15 meetings show how effectively their tactical alternative has worked against one of rugby’s most decorated teams.